Summary:
Terra’s Do Kwon has introduced three amendments to proposal 1623 meant to fork the chain into the Terra Classic (LUNC) and Terra (LUNA) chains. According to Do Kwon
, the amendments were necessary to accommodate community feedback and are as follows:Do Kwon went on to add that the Terra Ecosystem Revival Plan 2 document will continue to evolve. He said:
This will be a living document to coordinate the new network launch with the community. Details are subject to change.
This document has been edited in conjunction with input from the Terra Builders Alliance, and has endorsement of both the TBA and TFL.
To note is that Mr. Kwon’s amendments were made as voting was ongoing. However, he did include a statement that opened the doors to anyone who had voted and was not happy with the amendments to return and vote ‘no’ for the changes.
But still, the changes mid-vote elicited mixed emotions from the Terra Community. One such community member is @FatManTerra, who was unhappy with the process. He said:
What the hell? How can you make significant amendments to a proposal *mid-vote* when most people have already voted (for the original document)?
A new proposal in Terra Station should be made with a fresh vote. This is not cool. (No comment on the changes – just the execution.)
He also expressed concern that such amendments opened the doors to changes one or two hours before the end of the vote. He explained:
…changing significant details of a proposal that’s already a few days deep into voting isn’t cool.
Who’s to stop the proposal from being ‘amended’ an hour or two before closure? Any significant changes should be posted up as a brand new proposal.
At the time of writing, there are still five days of voting left, with 50% (185.264 million) of the potential votes cast. Of this amount, 79.31% are for the vote to fork the Terra chain.